Philosophy If Freud, in his Psychoanalysis Theory, believes that each person - from infancy - represses impulses or desires, which its parents reject - and shuts these unwanted impulses out into the unconscious. These are what he calls repressed thoughts. He suggests that, since this process happens throughout life, that infant grows into adulthood, doing things out of the command of those repressed impulses and desires in the unconscious mind. He concludes that the only way a person with overwhelming repressed material can be cured is for an expert therapist to access his unconscious and bring these repressed material to his conscious awareness. And because it is not conscious, and therefore not within the conscious control of the person, he cannot be responsible for what he does from the irresistible command of his unconscious. This makes Freud a determinist in that he believes that human nature, rather than reason, determines a person's culpability in his willful acts.

But Sartre argues that what Freud claims as unconscious repression is only self-deception. He explains this by saying that the patient has the dormant awareness of what ails him. The only trouble is that he is afraid to face or admit that he knows it. Or he rejects such a truth. Sartre illustrates this, using the therapy situation itself: that the patient gets "cured" either by admitting or denying the therapist's analysis of the patient's condition by revealing and interpreting the latter's repressions. If the patient can confirm the therapist's analysis, Freud thinks that it is only because the patient has known the truth itself all along, for he cannot confirm something he has a greater hold of. And if he resists it, it can only be because he is aware of it but does not want to confront it. Either way, the awareness already lies in the patient...

But Sartre says otherwise: a person has always had an awareness of what happens to him and is therefore always responsible - and accountable - for his every deed, because it is conscious and free. As he says, man is condemned to be free. If Freud acquits or shields man from culpability - under the guise of the unconscious --, Sartre accuses man for every act he makes because he is free and responsible, but is merely denying or avoiding facing that freedom and that responsibility.
Sartre emphasizes that man can control what enters his mind rather than pretend to fall victim to outside stimuli, e.g., parental wishes, social conventions, etc. Those so-called "repressions" such as norms, self-image and worldview, are really optional, i.e., he does not have to accept or retain them. He is in full possession of his mind and will. This, he believes, man cando from infancy, and he is not excusing the person at any stage of his development.

Instead, Sartre believes that all that man needs is the courage to face the truth -- each truth in his life and he need not shut anything out of his "conscious" mind into the unconscious counterpart. In this case, he is responsible and accountable for every action he performs.

Freud is a psychic determinist, while Sartre holds that man is utterly and irreversibly free.

In the mind of Freud, man is more a victim than a controller of life. But in Sartre's, man can never be a victim and will always remain answerable even if he refuses to answer for his act.

To recap, Freud maintains that the…